Ex parte WILKINSON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-2715                                                          
          Application 08/359,673                                                      



          circular brim which defines a wide-mouth opening for said jar;              
          and                                                                         
               (b) a removable lid for said jar which seals said wide-                
          mouth opening, said lid including:                                          
                    (1) a top wall disposed about a central axis;                     
                    (2) an encircling member extending downwardly from                
          said top wall and radially about the central axis, said                     
          encircling member including a screw thread which matingly                   
          engages with the screw threads located at the upper portion of              
          said side enclosure; and                                                    
                    (3) a circular flexible flange extending downwardly               
          from said lid and radially about said central axis, said                    
          flexible flange having a tip which is radially flexed relative              
          to a remainder of said flange upon engagement with said curved              
          upper wall of said base jar to seal therewith as the screw                  
          threads on the upper portion of the side enclosure of the base              
          jar matingly engage with the screw threads on the encircling                
          member of the removable lid.                                                

          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Novitch                        3,811,591       May  21, 1974                
          Abe et al. (Abe)               4,907,709       Mar. 13, 1990                
          Bourdier et al. (Bourdier)     2,431,432       Feb. 15, 1980                
          (French Patent Publication)                                                 
          Claims 2, 3, 6-10, 24 and 25 stand rejected under 35                        
          U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers               
          Abe in view of Bourdier with respect to claims 2, 3, 6-9, 24                
          and 25, and adds Novitch with respect to claim 10.  The final               
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007