Appeal No. 96-2741
Application 08/227,093
by 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(8)(iv). We noted in our decision
(D14-15) that Umezawa has only one locking member 21 and that
elements 19 and 20 noted by the examiner cannot be considered
locking members. Accordingly, we now reverse the anticipation
rejection of claims 11 and 13 over Umezawa.
- 11 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007