Appeal No. 96-2817 Application 08/082,549 (1) Circular body with periphery 16, having cutting end (frustrum of a cone) 2, and an end surface formed by E. (2) Terminal nose portion, 6. (3) Shank, 1. (4) Axially extending flutes (end surface), formed by E and D, see fig. 3. (apparently J-shaped) (5) Wall (radiused) having flat section tangent to a curved section, 7 and adjacent 7, see fig. 3. (6) Cutting edges, formed at 7 and 6 and adjacent F, defined by the intersection of said curved sections with said end surface E (answer, page 3). Claims 7 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Jodock in view of Maier. The examiner relies upon Maier to provide the drill reamer of Jodock with three flutes. Reference is made to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 10, mailed January 22, 1996) for the examiner's full reasoning in support of the above-noted rejections. Appellant's arguments thereagainst are found in the brief (Paper No. 9, 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007