THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BURTON S. RUBIN
____________
Appeal No. 96-2860
Application No. 08/049,4081
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 41 through 61, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed April 20, 1993.
2The rejection of claims 41 through 61 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, made in the final rejection was overcome
by the amendments filed on March 13, 1995 (Paper No. 10) and
April 3, 1995 (Paper No. 13). See the Advisory Actions of March
21, 1995 (Paper No. 11) and April 26, 1995 (Paper No. 14).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007