THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TOSHIO OKADA
________________
Appeal No. 96-2864
Application 08/048,5031
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, McQUADE and
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was originally taken from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 15, all of the claims pending in the
application. The appellant has since amended claims 1 through
15, and in response the examiner has withdrawn all rejections of
claims 9, 10, 14 and 15 which now stand allowed. Thus, the
1Application for patent filed April 20, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007