THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KENT PEAY, DAVID A. McCLOSKEY
and JAN M. ANDERSSON
________________
Appeal No. 96-3031
Application 08/098,0621
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the final rejection of claims 1,
2, 6 through 9, 13, 14 and 26. The examiner has since indicated
claim 26, which was amended subsequent to final rejection, to
stand allowed. Thus, the appeal as to claim 26 is hereby
dismissed, leaving for review the standing rejection of claims 1,
1Application for patent filed July 28, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007