THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 33 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte FRANK J. LANG and ROBERT W. CHADFIELD _____________ Appeal No. 96-3035 Application 07/945,4301 ______________ HEARD: February 4, 1998 _______________ Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and COHEN and Staab, Administrative Patent Judges. 1Application for patent filed September 14, 1992. According to appellants, the application is a continuation- in-part of Application 07/705,560, filed May 24, 1991, abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/613,285, filed November 15, 1990, abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007