Appeal No. 96-3090 Page 3
Application 08/287,409
section 112[2] as indefinite. (Paper 29 at 2.) The examiner
also relied on the following references in rejecting the
claims:
Schneidinger 3,740,680 19 June 1973
Augustyniak 3,818,156 18 June 1974
Angott 4,041,325 9 Aug. 1977
Pfeiffer et al. (Pfeiffer) 4,508,943 2 Apr. 1985
(filed 28 Mar. 1983)
The examiner rejected claims 44, 46, 48-50, 52, 54, 55,
57-61, and 63-65 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by
Schneidinger. (Paper 29 at 3.) The examiner rejected
claims 44-46, 48-52, 54, 55, and 57-65 under section 102(e) as
anticipated by Pfeiffer. (Paper 29 at 3.) The examiner
rejected claims 45, 47, 51, 53, 56, and 62 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as unpatentable over Schneidinger in view of Augustyniak
or Angott. (Paper 29 at 4.)
The examiner rejected claims 47 and 53 under section 103 as3
unpatentable over Pfeiffer in view of Augustyniak or Angott.
(Paper 29 at 4.)
3 We note there is no corresponding rejection of
claim 56 relying on Pfeiffer.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007