Appeal No. 96-3101 Application 08/020,570 European Patent Application 220 367 048 Oct. 21, 1989 Appealed claims 1 through 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the cited European patent document. The examiner’s main position is that the threshold value switch recited in claim 1 does not distinguish from the transistor 16 in each of the image point addressing circuits in the European patent document (see pages 4 and 5 of the answer). In particular, the examiner has made the following findings with regard to this reference: European patent 367 048 contains a circuit similar to applicant’s for controlling activated regions of a print form. As shown in figure 2, each region of the surface matrix is addressable by specific voltage applications to the appropriate transistor. The transistors act as switches to each point on the matrix while the capacitors are used to store a charge that indicates that the given point is activated. All points that are ?activated? will attract and 2 According to the PTO translation branch, U.S. Patent No. 5,109,240 (copy attached), which has now been cited by the examiner on page 2 of his answer in this appeal, is the equivalent of this European patent document. Our understanding of the European patent document is based on Patent No. 5,109,240. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007