THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN T. COMPTON
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3102
Application 08/322,9711
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
John T. Compton (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 1-3 and 5-12. Claim 13, the only other 2
claim remaining in the application, stands allowed.
1 Application for patent filed October 13, 1994. According to appellant, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/968,952, filed October 29, 1992, now
abandoned.
2 Claims 1, 6, 10 and 12 have been amended subsequent to final rejection.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007