THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARTIN KUSTERMANN and HANS-PETER SOLLINGER
____________
Appeal No. 96-3192
Application No. 08/247,6721
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claims 13 through 15, as amended subsequent to the final
1Application for patent filed May 23, 1994. According to
the appellants, the application is a division of Application
No. 07/631,375, filed December 20, 1990, which was a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/385,212, filed July
25, 1989.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007