Paper No. 17
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte DOUGLAS J. HERST
and UTKAN SALMAN
______________
Appeal No. 96-3201
Application 08/177,3991
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, PATE and MARTIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-
13, 18, 20 and 22-26. Claims 14-17, 19 and 21 have been
indicated as containing allowable subject matter and stand
Application for patent filed January 4, 1994. According to1
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/714,145,
filed June 11, 1991, now Patent No. 5,276,597 issued January 4, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007