Appeal No. 96-3204
Application 08/129,636
evidence in the case before us on appeal of an intent to
abandon the invention.
In sum, after reviewing the facts and the cases cited,
both pro and con, it is our opinion that the examiner has not
shown, by clear and convincing evidence, that appellants
abandoned their invention within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. §
102(c). Accordingly, the examiner's rejection of claims 10
through 30 and 32 through 39 is reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007