Paper No. 29
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte TETSUYA NISHIKUBO
AND MAKOTO SUZUKI
______________
Appeal No. 96-3212
Application 07/826,699 1
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges .
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge .
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 to 7, which constitute all the claims
in the application.
There are no references relied on by the examiner.
Application for patent filed January 28, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007