Appeal No. 96-3242
Application 08/458,012
under 35 U.S.C. § 102. In particular, Appellants argue that
Miura fails to teach a disc having recorded thereon a route
directory including at least positioning data of a file and
length data of the file, a volume descriptor including a
positioning information of a route directory and at least one
file name data, or that the recorded file has literature
super-vising data as per claims 20, 22 and 23. Appellants
further argue that Miura fails to teaches the retrieving
method steps as recited in claims 21, 24 and 25. For example,
claim 21 recites the step of reading out the volume
descriptor, displaying a file name according to the volume
descriptor, reading out and displaying the index data of the
selected file using the literature supervising data and
retrieving and displaying the index data of a lower layer
according to the selected index data of a higher layer.
On page 3 of the answer, the Examiner argues under 35
U.S.C. § 102, that the claim record medium including the
information content of the record medium stored thereon does
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007