Appeal No. 96-3298
Application 08/361,284
invention, if the result of the new combination be the same as
before”).
The Shillington reference was cited for its showing of
air intake pipes formed by a single plastic part, and does not
add anything to the Miyano and Parr references insofar as the
deficiencies discussed above are concerned.
Accordingly, we conclude that the applied prior art does
not make out a prima facie case of obviousness.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-9-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007