Appeal No. 96-3404 Application 08/145,775 success must be due to claimed features, and not unclaimed features. Joy Technologies v. Manbeck, 751 F. Supp. 225, 231, 17 USPQ2d 1257, 1260-61 (D.D.C. 1990), aff’d, 959 F.2d 226, 229, 22 USPQ2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (features responsible for commercial success were recited only in allowed dependent claims, and therefore the evidence of commercial success was not commensurate in scope with the broad claims at issue). Moreover, the affiant provides no facts that tend to establish that the license was requested and obtained out of recognition and respect for the claimed invention as opposed to being requested and obtained for other reasons. EWP Corp. v. Reliance Universal, Inc., 755 F.2d 898, 225 USPQ 20, 26 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 843 (1985)(license programs sometimes succeed because they are mutually beneficial to the license group or because of business judgment that it is cheaper to take licenses than to defend infringement suits, or for other reasons unrelated to the unobviousness of the licensed subject matter). When all the evidence and argument are considered anew it is our conclusion that, on balance, the evidence and argument 28Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007