Ex Parte CALLIS et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-3431                                                          
          Application No. 08/307,535                                                  


          and detergents (e.g., see lines 1 through 3 in column 8).  In               
          this regard, King discloses the here claimed sulfurized                     
          molybdenum-containing composition as an antioxidant additive for            
          lubricating oils and, significantly, fuels (e.g., see the                   
          abstract, lines 3 through 7 in column 2 as well as lines 5                  
          through 44 and especially line 37 in column 7), and Norman                  
          discloses the here claimed succinimide as a detergent additive              
          for lubricants and, significantly, fuel compositions (e.g., see             
          lines 13 through 18 in column 1 and lines 18 through 30 in column           
          2).  These applied reference disclosures evince that it would               
          have been prima facie obvious for one with ordinary skill in the            
          art to provide the fuel composition of Miller with a sulfurized             
          molybdenum-containing composition and a succinimide in order to             
          obtain the oxidation-inhibiting and detergent properties desired            
          by patentee via additives shown by King and Norman to be known in           
          the prior art as supplying such properties.                                 
               According to the appellants, "it is clear that the                     
          references are from non-analogous art", and "[a]s neither Norman            














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007