THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HANS-JURGEN REISMANN and KONRAD HAMRATHS
________________
Appeal No. 96-3441
Application 08/137,8681
________________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 3, 1998
________________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal, filed in response to the final rejection dated
June 19, 1995 (Paper No. 7), involves claims 2 through 4, 7 and
9, all of the claims pending in the application.2
1Application for patent filed October 15, 1993.
2Claims 2, 3 and 7 were amended and claim 9 was added
subsequent to the final rejection.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007