THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HARRIS M. GITLIN and JAMES W. MALONEY, JR.
__________
Appeal No. 96-3482
Application 08/155,0101
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 1 through 8 and 11. At that point, claims 9 and
10 had been canceled, and the examiner had indicated that
dependent claims 5 and 6 would be allowable if rewritten in
independent form.
1Application for patent filed November 19, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007