THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ANTHONY J. ROBERTSON
and CHARLES L. SCRIPPS
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3549
Application 08/171,4841
______________
HEARD: December 8, 1997
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 76
through 85. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining
in the application.
1 Application for patent filed December 21, 1993. According to
appellants, the application is a division of Application 07/896,020, filed June
9, 1992, which is a division of Application 07/576,316, filed August 29, 1990,
now abandoned, which is a division of Application 07/134,275, filed December
17, 1987, now Patent No. 4,963,140, granted October 16, 1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007