Ex parte POZZO - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-3610                                                          
          Application 08/300,567                                                      



          consequence of our review, we make the determinations which                 
          follow.                                                                     







                              The obviousness rejection                               
                    We must reverse this rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103.             


                    The examiner applies two documents as evidence in this            
          rejection.  We shall focus entirely upon the reference denoted by           
          the name Giovanni.  In the rejection (answer, page 4), it is                
          indicated that, as to this reference, “[f]igures were all that              
          were available to the examiner.”  In the application file, we               
          find a document that is a single sheet with drawing Figures on              
          both sides thereof that appear to portray something referenced by           
          numerals that seem to correspond to what the examiner                       
          characterizes in the rejection as the disclosure of the Giovanni            
          reference.  The noted document in the file does not bear the                
          number (637,711) listed by the examiner on the aforementioned               
          “NOTICE  OF REFERENCES CITED” form (attachment to Paper No. 9),             
          does not show the name Giovanni, and does not indicate a date of            
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007