THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NOBORU INAMINE
and ATSUSHI HARADA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3746
Application 08/236,0071
______________
HEARD: December 11, 1997
_______________
Before COHEN, MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1-6 and 9-33. Claims 7-8 have been
canceled.
Appellants’ invention is an ink supply control device.
1Application for patent filed May 2, 1994. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of application
08/100,342 filed August 2, 1993, which is a continuation of
application 07/882,594 filed May 13, 1992, both abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007