Appeal No. 96-3821 Application No. 08/122,264 group analysis, a characteristic feature of number average molecular weight determinations (e.g., Polymers; Structure and Bulk Properties, by Patrick Meares (D. Van Nostrand Company, 1965), pages 55-56, and Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, Vol. 6 (Interscience Publishers, 1967), pages 164- 165 (copies enclosed)), Appellants submit that one skilled in the art would understand that the term "average molecular weight" refers to number average molecular weight. Appellants submit that because their specification reasonably conveys to those skilled in the art what they have invented, they have fully satisfied the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112. Compare Staehelin v. Secher, 24 U.S.P.Q.2d 1513 (B.P.A.I. 1992); In re Johnson and Farnham, 194 U.S.P.Q. 187 (C.C.P.A. 1977); and In re Moore and Janoski, 439 F.2d 1232, 169 U.S.P.Q. 236, 238 (C.C.P.A. 1971). The entire line of argument, including the reference to passages in pages 5, 6, and 8 of the specification and to the aforementioned texts, is advanced for the first time in appellants' Request for Rehearing. A brief before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("Board") "must set forth the authorities and arguments on which appellant will rely to maintain the appeal." 37 CFR § 1.192(a). A new argument advanced in a petition for rehearing, but not advanced in appellants' Brief, is not properly before the Board and will not be considered. In re Kroekel, 803 F.2d 705, 709, 231 USPQ 640, 642-43 (Fed. -4-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007