Paper No. 29
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ROBERT A. HALLMAN, ROBERT D. HENSEL
EUGENE M. KIRCHNER, JEFFREY S. ROSS
AND JEROME D. WISNOSKY
______________
Appeal No. 96-3822
Application 08/143,384 1
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before RONALD H. SMITH, METZ and HANLON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RONALD H. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge .
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-13,
21, 22, 24, 26 and 27, all the pending claims in the application.
Application for patent filed October 29, 1993. According to1
applicants, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/813,669, filed December 27, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007