THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 51
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOSHIO AIBE
____________
Appeal No. 96-3841
Application No. 08/093,6641
____________
HEARD: February 5, 1998
____________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 5 to 9, 13, 16, 17, 23, 25 and 26. 2
Claims 3, 4, 18 to 22, 24, 27 and 28 have been withdrawn from
consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being drawn to a
nonelected invention. Claims 10 to 12, 14 and 15 have been
canceled.
1Application for patent filed July 20, 1993. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/793,107, filed November 15, 1991, now abandoned.
2Claim 26 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007