Appeal No. 96-3923 Application 08/309,790 unpatentable over Fuller in view of Rose and claims 8-11 as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Ray. In summary: The rejections of claims 15-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second paragraphs, are reversed. The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1 and 5-7 as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Rose and claims 1-4 as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Ray are reversed. The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 8 and 12- 14 as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Rose and claims 8-11 as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Ray are affirmed. 16Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007