THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PARK HONG
____________
Appeal No. 96-3999
Application No. 08/395,7191
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3 and 6. Claim 4 has been objected to as
depending from a non allowed claim. Claims 2 and 5 have been
canceled.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART and enter new rejections pursuant to
1Application for patent filed February 28, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007