Appeal No. 96-4004 Application 08/342,603 The invention relates to a machine and method for bagging silage material. A copy of the appealed claims appears in the appendix to the appellant’s brief (Paper No. 9). The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of obviousness are: Eggenmuller et al. (Eggenmuller) 3,687,061 Aug. 29, 1972 Cox et al. (Cox) 4,653,553 Mar. 31, 1987 Claims 10 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. � 103 as being unpatentable over Cox in view of Eggenmuller. Reference is made to the appellant’s brief (Paper No. 9) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 10) for the respective positions of the appellant and the examiner with regard to the merits of this rejection. Cox discloses a bag loading machine 10 which is designed to form and deliver into an agricultural bag 18 a dense mass of animal feed material such as forage or silage. The machine includes an infeed conveyor 32, a hopper 42, a pair of vertically-disposed, laterally-spaced tine shaft assemblies 34 and 36, a feed material compression and forming chamber 40, and a delivery chamber 44. These components are arranged as -2-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007