Ex parte DEVANBU - Page 5

          Appeal No. 96-4026                                                          
          Application 07/781,564                                                      

          nothing corresponding to the claimed ‘method specification’ in              
          Chan.”  Accordingly, Chan is not an anticipating reference with             
          regard to the instant claimed subject matter.                               
               The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 2, 4 through 8             
          and 10 through 13 under 35 U.S.C. '  102(e) and claims 3 and 9              
          under 35 U.S.C. '  103 is reversed.                                         
                                      REVERSED                                        






          James D. Thomas                 )                                           
               Administrative Patent Judge     )                                      
                    )                                                                 
                                            )                                        
                                             )                                        
                    Errol A. Krass                  ) BOARD OF PATENT                 
                    Administrative Patent Judge     )   APPEALS AND                   
                                             )  INTERFERENCES                         
                                             )                                        
                                            )                                        
                    Lee E. Barrett                  )                                 
               Administrative Patent Judge     )                                      















                                          5                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007