Paper No. 10
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte FRANK C. GOODMAN,
ROBERT T. SEELEY AND
ROBERT J. DEMPSEY
______________
Appeal No. 96-4102
Application 08/500,4211
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before ABRAMS, PATE, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 4 and 5
and the examiner’s refusal to allow claim 6, amended after final
rejection. Claims 4, 5, and 6 are the only claims remaining in
the application.
1Application for patent filed July 10, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007