THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte FREDERICK A. HAUBER
__________
Appeal No. 96-4117
Application 08/077,3801
__________
REHEARING
__________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS, PATE, III, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This case comes before us on request for rehearing of our
decision of March 31, 1998. It is the appellant’s contention
that we erred in sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claims
1Application for patent filed June 17, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007