Appeal No. 96-4189
Application 08/279,157
at said receiver arrangement and
providing visual feedback con-
firming receipt and recognition
of said predetermined IR signals
by said receiver arrangement when
the authorization code has been
received, and thereafter,
providing visual prompts to
alter the status of the security
system . . . .
The Examiner argues on pages 4 and 5 of the answer
that Lewiner teaches in column 2, lines 53-63, and column 3,
lines 29-32, that multiple actuation of the keys of the remote
determines the entry code. The Examiner also states that
Lewiner teaches in column 4, lines 52-56, that the code can be
displayed to the user prior to being transmitted.
Upon a careful review of Lewiner, we fail to find
the Appellant's claimed limitations of the multiple sequence
of interaction between the user and the interior receiver in
which a predetermined IR signal is transmitted by the remote,
the receiver in response displays a visual prompt, a series of
IR signals is then transmitted by the remote and then the
receiver instructs the control panel to change the status of
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007