Ex parte BEHLING - Page 2




                Appeal No. 97-0381                                                                                                            
                Application 08/324,108                                                                                                        


                         The subject matter on appeal relates to a method of                                                                  
                manufacturing a pre-fabricated building wall.  Claim 12 is                                                                    
                illustrative and reads as follows:                                                                                            
                         12. A method of manufacturing a wall for a manufactured                                                              
                building, said method comprising:                                                                                             
                         providing a rectangular frame having opposite plate members                                                          
                and studs extending between said plate members;                                                                               
                         applying glue to said studs and said plate members;                                                                  
                         placing wallboard in contact with said glue applied to said                                                          
                studs and plate members;                                                                                                      
                         attaching a rigid rail to said studs to overly and in                                                                
                contact with the wallboard to urge said wallboard against said                                                                
                studs as said glue cures;  and            2                                                                                   
                         removing the rail when said glue has set.                                                                            
                         The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                                                            
                obviousness are:                                                                                                              
                Dawdy                                     4,069,640                        Jan. 24, 1978                                      
                Kuhr                                      4,757,663                        Jul. 19, 1988                                      








                         2The language employed by the appellant to define the                                                                
                “attaching” step in claim 12 is obviously garbled and is                                                                      
                deserving of correction in the event of further prosecution                                                                   
                before the examiner.                                                                                                          
                                                                    -2-                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007