THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte VINCENT J. PILEGGI
__________
Appeal No. 97-0454
Application No. 08/089,3751
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 5, 6, 10 and 11, which constitute all of the
claims remaining of record in the application.
1Application for patent filed July 12, 1993. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/818,081, filed January 8, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,239,707,
issued August 31, 1993, which is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/774,796, filed October 10, 1991, now abandoned,
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/724,835, filed
July 2, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007