THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 34 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte VINCENT J. PILEGGI __________ Appeal No. 97-0454 Application No. 08/089,3751 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 5, 6, 10 and 11, which constitute all of the claims remaining of record in the application. 1Application for patent filed July 12, 1993. According to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application 07/818,081, filed January 8, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,239,707, issued August 31, 1993, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/774,796, filed October 10, 1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/724,835, filed July 2, 1991, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007