Appeal No. 97-0593
Application 08/365,906
Claims 1 through 5, 7, 10, 11 and 16 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Stashko in view
of Warren.
Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Stashko in view of Warren as applied above, and
further in view of Holma.
Claims 12 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Stashko in view of Warren as
applied to claim 11 above, and further in view of Romagnolo.
Rather than reiterate the examiner's full explanation
of the above-noted rejections and the conflicting viewpoints
advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding those
rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No.
13, mailed July 1, 1996) for the examiner's reasoning in support
of the rejections, and to appellant's brief (Paper No. 12, filed
May 22, 1996) and reply brief (Paper No. 14, filed July 22, 1996)
for appellant's arguments thereagainst.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007