Appeal No. 97-0608
Application 08/287,143
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and MEISTER,
FRANKFORT, PATE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 12 through 20 and from the exam-
iner's refusal to allow claims 1 and 3 through 11 as amended
subsequent to the final rejection in a paper filed November
16, 1995 (Paper No. 10). Claim 2 has been canceled.2
Appellants' invention relates to a process for
manufacturing void fill material. As is apparent from a
review of the specification, void fill material constitutes
2While the examiner has approved entry (in-part) of the
amendment filed November 16, 1995, we note that such changes
have not been clerically entered in the file in the manner
specified by the examiner. Correction of this oversight
should be attended to during any further prosecution of this
application before the examiner.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007