THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte EUGENE M. LORINCZ
__________
Appeal No. 97-0675
Application No. 08/389,6841
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 30-34, which constitute all of the
claims remaining of record in the application.
Application for patent filed February 16, 1995.1
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/864,656, filed April 7, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007