THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PERETZ ROSENBERG
____________
Appeal No. 97-0690
Application No. 08/375,0941
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
According to appellant’s Notice of Appeal (Paper No. 7,
filed May 16, 1996), this appeal is from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 20. We note, however, that in
Application for patent filed January 19, 1995. According to appellant,1
this application is a continuation-in-part of application 08/138,285, filed
October 20, 1993, now U.S. Patent No. 5,390,850, issued February 21, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007