Appeal No. 97-0740 Application 08/144,818 in the cavity of the truck. The examiner has cited no reference which teaches or suggests a foldable assembly, of any kind, which when folded forms a package which fits within the cavity of a pickup truck. In view of the foregoing we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 11, 12, 14 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Gross in view of D’Annunzio, Gordin, Koether and Haubert. We have reviewed the disclosures of Lange, Andersen, Aakre, Anastasakis, Sheets, Sinner and Naideth in connection with the rejections of claims 13, 15-17, 19 and 20 which are dependent on claim 11 but these disclosures do not cure the deficiencies noted above for the combination of Gross, D’Annunzio, Gordin, Koether and Haubert. As such, we will not sustain the rejections of claims 13, 15, 16, 17, 19 and 20. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007