THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte FRANCISCO G. LOPEZ, ROSCOE M. FARRELL
AND MELVIN EULISS
__________
Appeal No. 97-0747
Application 08/443,2581
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and McQUADE and CRAWFORD,
Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Francisco G. Lopez et al. appeal from the final rejection of claims 15 through 21 and
1Application for patent filed May 17, 1996. According to appellants, the application is a
division of Application 08/101,360, filed August 03, 1993, now Patent No. 5,561,861, issued October
8, 1996.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007