THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte VINCENT P. BASILICE and JOSEPH P. BASILICE
________________
Appeal No. 97-0938
Application 08/292,5021
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, McQUADE
and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 15 through
17 and 19 through 22, all of the claims pending in the
application.
1Application for patent filed August 18, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is continuation of 08/081,351,
filed June 28, 1993, now U. S. Patent No. 5,366,448, issued
November 22, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007