Ex parte TEEPLE - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 97-0943                                                                                       Page 2                        
                 Application No. 08/232,502                                                                                                             


                 35.   Claims 11, 12, 15 through 21, 24, 25 and 27 through 322                                                                                                                                
                 have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b)                                                                         
                 as being drawn to a nonelected invention.  Claims 3, 4, 8, 13,                                                                         
                 14, 22, 23 and 26 have been canceled.                                                                                                  


                          We AFFIRM, however, for reasons explained infra, we have                                                                      
                 denominated our affirmance a new ground of rejection under 37                                                                          
                 CFR § 1.196(b).                                                                                                                        


                                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                           
                          The appellant's invention relates to a method of                                                                              
                 preparing a drug solution.  Claim 1 is representative of the                                                                           
                 subject matter on appeal and a copy of claim 1 is attached to                                                                          
                 this decision.                                                                                                                         


                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner as evidence of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                                                                         
                 Rubalcaba, Jr.                                        4,898,578                                             Feb.                       
                 6, 1990                                                                                                                                


                          2Claims 2, 5, 7 and 33 have been amended subsequent to                                                                        
                 the final rejection.                                                                                                                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007