THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PATRICK A. DOLGAS, E. WAYNE ZICHT
and ALVIN C. BANNER
__________
Appeal No. 97-0986
Application 08/430,5801
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before MEISTER, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 2, 9
and 12. Claims 1, 3-8, 10 and 11, the only other claims remaining in the application, have
been allowed.
1Application for patent filed April 28, 1995. According to the appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 08/234,134, filed April 28, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007