Appeal No. 97-1023
Application 08/262,461
the upper ends of shoulder belt sections connected to the seat
back of the child seat and with the lower ends of the shoulder
belt sections being pulled down by a retractor means mounted
on the seat cushion of the child seat. As a concluding point,
we simply note that the child restraint system disclosed in
the Dukatz patent does not overcome the noted deficiencies of
the Harmon and Mathis teachings.
In summary, this panel of the board has:
reversed the rejection of claims 14, 15, and 5 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Harmon in view of
Mathis; and
reversed the rejection of claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Harmon in view of Mathis and
Dukatz.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007