THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JAMES V. CARTMELL, WAYNE R. STURTEVANT
and MICHAEL L. WOLF
________________
Appeal No. 97-1029
Application 08/456,1661
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, STAAB
and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed May 31, 1995. According
to appellants, the application is a division of Application
08/144,003, filed November 1, 1993, now U.S. Patent No.
5,695,456, issued December 9, 1997, which is a continuation-
in-part of Application 07/862,456, filed April 2, 1992, now
U.S. Patent No. 5,429,589, issued July 4, 1995.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007