THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BENJAMIN L. GARFINKLE
__________
Appeal No. 97-1085
Application 08/369,7121
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 1 through 9, which constitute all of the claims
of record in the application.
1Application for patent filed January 6, 1995. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 08/125,522 filed September 22, 1993, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,402,897 issued April 4, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007