THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TOMMY L. JONES ____________ Appeal No. 97-1114 Application No. 08/222,6431 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before STAAB, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 17, which are all of the claims pending in this application. The appellant states (brief, p. 2) that the "claims appealed are claims 6 through 15 and 17." Accordingly, the appeal as to claims 1 through 5 and 16 is dismissed. 1Application for patent filed March 31, 1994.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007