Ex parte JONES - Page 1



                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                

                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                         Paper No. 13                         
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                   Ex parte TOMMY L. JONES                                                                    
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 97-1114                                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/222,6431                                                                   
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                Before STAAB, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            



                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                               
                rejection of claims 1 through 17, which are all of the claims                                                                 
                pending in this application.  The appellant states (brief, p. 2)                                                              
                that the "claims appealed are claims 6 through 15 and 17."                                                                    
                Accordingly, the appeal as to claims 1 through 5 and 16 is                                                                    
                dismissed.                                                                                                                    




                         1Application for patent filed March 31, 1994.                                                                        




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007