Appeal No. 97-1133 Application 08/424,247 cellulose acetate, which may be tinted, can be employed to provide the desired glare elimination, without the need of the fairly heavy tinting required in the prior art devices. After a collective evaluation of the teachings of the applied references, it is our opinion that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of appellant's invention to have made the shade members (8) of Klose from a transparent tinted plastic material so as to block a substantial portion of sunlight or other glare producing lights that may impinge on the window, and to provide such an advantage without otherwise obscuring the driver's view of the roadway, as clearly suggested in Stulbach or Kivikink. We further consider that, based on the teachings of Selph, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been led to select a transparent, tinted plastic polarized material as the particular material from which to make the shades (8) of Klose so as to gain the advantages noted in Selph (i.e., so as to 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007