THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MITCHELL J. FRANCIS and GARY H. PACKMAN
________________
Appeal No. 97-1142
Application 08/260,8311
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-4, all the claims currently pending in the application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to an amusement ride which
includes a digital video player that projects a 3-D image onto a
1Application for patent filed June 16, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007